On the institutions impacting the operational space of civil society
On the obstructions faced by civil society organizations as a consequence of this context
Responses & Remedies
On NPO responses to operational constraints faced due to AML/CFT measures
The FATF has been urging countries to conduct a Risk Assessment of the NPO sector - here is what that means
Click here to see a visual explainer of the above
How to engage as an NPO in mitigating the effects of the CFT standards?
We have broken down the engagement process into various steps. Click on the right for a short introduction to each step, or click below for more extensive information on how you can get involved.
Conducting relevant outreach
Conducting relevant outreach with a multitude of stakeholders, including NPOs, government, financial institutions, regulators and regional/international bodies.
Mutual monitoring by both NPOs and government.
Engaging in risk assessment
Sustained engagement of the NPO sector by government as well as involvement of the sector in the Risk Assessment process itself.
Engaging in Mutual Evaluation process
Starting with the Risk Assessment of the sector, continuing with participation in the Mutual Evaluation on-site visit and, finally, engaging in the Mutual Evaluation follow-up process.
Gather evidence and information
Gathering evidence and information on the unintended consequences of the countering the financing of terrorism (CFT) agenda on the operational environment of civil society.
Raising awareness among multiple stakeholders on drivers of regulations, unintended consequences for NPOs, and engagement and advocacy strategies.
Tunisia: lessons in a successful multi-stakeholder engagement process
Watch this video (made by Al Kawakibi Democracy Transition Center) to learn more about the successful multi-stakeholder dialogue process between a civil society coalition and various government bodies around a joint sectoral Risk Assessment and the FATF process in general. Hear about the trust-building that enabled a sustained engagement, and resulted in a fully Compliant rating for the sector on Recommendation 8.
Video of results of NPO risk mapping exercise in 17 Latin American countries
Watch this video (in Spanish with English subtitles) of the results of the NPO risk mapping exercise conducted in 17 countries in Latin America. The report presents an in-depth analysis of an extensive survey of findings (729 nonprofit sector representatives surveyed in the 17 participating countries), and recommends reforms that can be implemented.
FATF and Civic Space: Lessons from Nigeria
In this article, Victoria Ibezim-Ohaeri, Executive Director of Spaces for Change, walks us through the developments around shrinking space for civil society in Nigeria and how her NPO successfully organized civil society in engaging in the FATF process.
Myanmar: brief on impact of FATF blacklisting on NPOs
February 20, 2023
Myanmar put on the FATF blacklist
November 3, 2022
Frequently Asked Questions
- What are some of the achievements of the Global NPO Coalition on FATF?
Some of the Coalition achievements so far include:
- Revision of Recommendation 8 and its Interpretive Note: the June 2016 revision retracts the claim that the NPO sector is ‘particularly vulnerable’ to terrorist abuse.
- In-depth revision of the Best Practices Paper (June 2015), a policy guidance document that countries use to help them implement the Standards.
- Formalization of a risk-based approach, which means a more proportionate and context-specific implementation of the FATF Standards. For the NPO sector, this means that supervision and regulation needs to be risk-based and proportionate to the risk that remains after existing (self-)regulatory measures have been taken into account.
- Establishment of regular engagement between the FATF Secretariat and NPOs, which allows for more effective NPO participation.
- Four additional NPO seats at the annual Private Sector Consultative Forum (since 2017) (the transparency NPOs have two seats).
- Awareness-raising and coalition-building at the global, regional and national levels.
- Criticism by the FATF of the wholesale derisking of NPOs at the G20 level.
- Creation of a specific online mechanism on the FATF website for NPO input ahead of country evaluations (see FAQ page on FATF website 'How can NPOs and civil society organisations provide input into FATF Mutual Evaluations?')
- Sustained advocacy and pressure, leading to the setting up of the FATF Unintended Consequences workstream in 2021 looking at de-risking, financial exclusion, NPO suppression, and the impact of a misapplication of the FATF Standards on human rights and due process.
- What is the difference between the FATF and the Global Coalition on the FATF?
The Global NPO Coalition on FATF is a loose network of diverse nonprofit organizations (NPOs). The Coalition advocates for improvement in the quality and effectiveness of FATF Mutual Evaluations with sustained outreach to the NPO sector, and the effective, risk-based implementation of FATF Recommendations affecting NPOs, particularly Recommendation 8 (R8). The aim is to mitigate the unintended consequences of countering the financing of terrorism (CFT) policies on civil society in order that legitimate charitable activity is not disrupted. The advocacy agenda is driven by policy changes at the FATF/global/national level that require swift action and engagement by NPOs as well as by a bottom-up process emerging from impact felt by NPOs on the ground.
The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) is an intergovernmental organization founded in 1989 at the initiative of the G7 to develop policies to combat money laundering. In 2001, its mandate was expanded to include terrorism financing.
- How does the FATF fit into the global counterterrorism architecture?
Much of the counterterrorism architecture was solidified after 9/11, when multilateral bodies such as the UN and the FATF were mobilized under intense pressure from the US. The global counterterrorism architecture has the UN at its centre, with its four-pillared strategy, its means of implementation of that strategy (through conventions, protocols and sanctions), and the implementing bodies themselves (the Global Compact entities). See more here.
Countering the financing of terrorism (along with tackling money laundering and dealing with proliferation finance) is mainly the domain of the FATF and the FATF-Style Regional Bodies.
The UN uses sanctions to counter the financing of terrorism and the FATF puts in place rules and regulations ('the Standards') to do the same.